CSUMB Learning Journal 2025

Before starting this Software Engineering course, I expected it to focus primarily on programming techniques and learning how to write better code. I assumed most of the class would be about using different programming languages, design patterns, and frameworks to build applications. I also expected to spend time learning debugging techniques and improving coding efficiency. While I knew teamwork might be discussed, I did not realize how much emphasis software engineering places on the overall process of developing and maintaining software. After completing the first week, my perspective has changed. I now understand that software engineering is much broader than just programming. Writing code is only one part of creating successful software. The course introduced concepts like maintainability, sustainability, testing strategies, version control, and the importance of making design decisions that support long-term development. These topics highlighted that software often lives for man...

  This week focused on classification models, particularly logistic regression and k-nearest neighbors (kNN), as well as evaluating model performance. One of the most useful concepts I learned was how logistic regression uses the sigmoid function to convert a linear combination of predictors into a probability between 0 and 1. Before this week, I understood classification at a high level, but I did not fully understand how a model could estimate the probability that an observation belongs to a particular class. I also learned more about confusion matrices and the metrics derived from them, including accuracy, precision, recall, and false positives. Working through examples helped me see that accuracy alone does not always tell the full story, especially when one type of error is more important than another. Understanding recall was particularly helpful because it measures how well a model identifies actual positive cases. Another important topic was the comparison between logistic ...

     This week in class focused on several important machine learning concepts, including linear regression, classification, train/test splits, model evaluation, and hyperparameter tuning. One of the biggest takeaways for me was understanding the difference between training a model and evaluating how well it generalizes to new data. Before this week, I tended to focus on how well a model fit the training data, but I now understand that test performance is a much better indicator of how useful a model will be in practice. I also learned more about the role of hyperparameters and how they differ from model parameters. The discussion of GridSearchCV helped me understand how machine learning practitioners systematically search for better hyperparameter values rather than choosing them arbitrarily. I found it interesting that the best hyperparameters can vary significantly depending on the dataset being used. One concept that I’m still working to fully understand is the tradeo...

  This week focused on data exploration, preprocessing, and building a K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classification model. One of the most interesting topics was learning how important it is to understand and clean data before training a model. The diabetes dataset looked clean at first because there were no missing values, but after exploring the data more closely, we discovered that many predictor variables contained zeros that were likely acting as missing values. This showed me that data quality problems are not always obvious and that domain knowledge is important when analyzing datasets. I also learned how visualization can reveal patterns that are difficult to see in summary statistics alone. Histograms, boxplots, scatterplots, and pair plots helped identify outliers and suspicious values. The process of removing problematic rows and then standardizing the data before applying KNN made it clear that preprocessing can have a major impact on model performance. One concept I am sti...